January 28, 2002

Who is this Kidnapper Guy?

Jeez, it's hard catching up, when you've missed a whole day...

It appears that Daniel Pearl, the missing American journalist, was indeed kidnapped by a Pakistani Islamist group. They call themselves the National Movement for the Restoration of Pakistani Sovereignty, and have released photos of Mr. Pearl with a gun held to his head.

An accompanying message sent to US news organisations said Mr Pearl was being held in inhuman conditions - similar, it said, to those experienced by al-Qaeda suspects being held at the US base at Guantanamo Bay. Their captive would receive better treatment only if conditions at Camp X-Ray improved and Pakistani detainees were sent home

The bizarre thing about this story: the message and the photos were emailed to media outlets from a hotmail account with the user name "kidnapperguy." Even granted the fact that Richard Reid sent email from a French cybercafe, something about the tone of this one seems a little, well, odd. Kidnapperguy?

And this doesn't sound like the authentic "voice" of the Islamist crew (in fact, it sounds more like a Guradian columnist):

WSJ quoted it as saying that Mr Pearl was being held "in very inhuman circumstances - quite similar in fact to the way Pakistanis and nationals of other sovereign countries are being kept in Cuba by the American army".

The e-mail reportedly went on to say: "If the Americans keep our countrymen in better conditions, than we will better the conditions of Mr Pearl and all other Americans that we capture."


According to the New York Times, in addition to the English text, there was also text in Urdu, in which the group included an off-the-wall demand for the US to deliver F-16 fighter jets to the Pakistani government that has banned it:
Among the conditions are demands for the repatriation of Pakistani prisoners taken from Afghanistan to Cuba and for the release of the F-16 fighter jets that Pakistan bought from the United States in the 1980's. The fighter jets were not delivered after Congress in 1990 cut off aid and military sales to Pakistan in response to the country's moves to develop nuclear weapons.

Obviously, if it's not a hoax (and it doesn't appear to be) avoiding the "God is great" rhetoric must be intentional. But to what end?

Posted by Dr. Frank at January 28, 2002 12:35 PM | TrackBack