May 09, 2002

Reuters and "terrorism," again: A

Reuters and "terrorism," again:

A blast tore through a Victory Day parade in southern Russia on Thursday, killing at least 29 people, including seven children.

Police said a remote-controlled mine hidden in bushes exploded as a military band surrounded by children and World War Two veterans marched through Kaspiisk, a Caspian Sea port some 1,000 miles from Moscow.

Abdul Musayev, head of the interior ministry press office in Mahkachkala, said 29 people, including seven children and 14 servicemen, had died in the attack.

Itar-Tass reported that local authorities put the death toll at 30.

Police said nuts, bolts and nails in the device were designed to cause maximum injury.


According to Reuters, Putin "blamed the attack on 'terrorists,' the usual Kremlin term to describe separatist rebels in Chechnya." I'd say you could make a good case for using "the usual Kremlin term" without inverted commas to describe the perpetrators of such an attack. Though Putin's other term (scum) also seems to fit.

UPDATE: Eric Olsen noticed the inverted commas as well, and had this to say:

You aren't taking sides on the merits of a matter to call a terrorist a terrorist. You can be even sympathetic to the cause in question and still call a terrorist act "terrorism." A remote-control nail bomb attack timed to kill as many children as possible at a public parade IS THE VERY ESSENCE OF TERRORISM. If the word "terrorism" has any meaning at all, it has to applied here. By dismissing and even mocking Putin's use of the word under these circumstances, Reuters has let it be known where their sympathies lie: with the Chechan TERRORISTS. You can't get much farther from neutrality than that.

Well said.

Posted by Dr. Frank at May 9, 2002 10:51 AM | TrackBack