While I believe this writer's vaguely conspiracy-theory- and anti-corporate-driven unease is misplaced, this is nonetheless an interesting account of the story behind the "EU struggles to define sauce as a vegetable" story. The verdict: "such stories confirm all our worst fears about Brussels and the EU writ large;" not only that, but they have the added, and, for the article's author, the unexpected, benefit of actually being true.
Yesterday's Times describes the Euro-bureau-neuro-sis of the "nomenclature sub-group of the customs code committee" thus:
The EU’s maximum “lump limit” is currently set at 20 per cent. This was originated to stop importers avoiding high tariffs on vegetables by disguising them as sauces.Regulation 288/97 states: “The expression ‘sauce’ does not cover a preparation of vegetables, fruit or other edible plants if the percentage of those ingredients passing through a metal wire sieve with an aperture of five millimetres is, after rinsing in water of a temperature of 20C, less than 80 per cent by weight calculated on the original preparation.” Put simply, that means that a tinned sauce does not qualify as a sauce if it is more than one-fifth lumps.
EU regulators have an able adversary in "Le Comité des Industries des Mayonnaises et Sauces Condimentaires de l’Union Européenne," who despite their Euro-ic name can score propaganda coups merely by quoting euro-jargon and letting the press do its thing.
For Britons who feel like Chicken Tonight, the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement must be looking looking just a bit tastier...
Posted by Dr. Frank at January 11, 2002 06:05 PM | TrackBack